thehatfox@lemmy.world to Selfhosted@lemmy.worldEnglish · 11 months agoICANN approves use of .internal domain for your networkwww.theregister.comexternal-linkmessage-square20linkfedilinkarrow-up10arrow-down10
arrow-up10arrow-down1external-linkICANN approves use of .internal domain for your networkwww.theregister.comthehatfox@lemmy.world to Selfhosted@lemmy.worldEnglish · 11 months agomessage-square20linkfedilink
minus-squaredhtseany@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·11 months agoI still haven’t heard a convincing argument to not use .local and I see no reason to stop.
minus-squareSirEDCaLot@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·11 months agoMainly conflicts with mDNS. However it’s shitty IMHO that the mDNS spec snarfed a domain already in widespread use, should have used .mDNS or similar.
minus-squarecorsicanguppy@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·11 months agoTell me you don’t share a net with Macs without using those words.
minus-squarekingthrillgore@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·11 months ago.local is already used by mDNS/Zeroconf.
minus-squarex00z@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·11 months agoYou mean mDNS/Zeroconf are using a tld that was already being used.
I still haven’t heard a convincing argument to not use .local and I see no reason to stop.
Mainly conflicts with mDNS. However it’s shitty IMHO that the mDNS spec snarfed a domain already in widespread use, should have used .mDNS or similar.
Tell me you don’t share a net with Macs without using those words.
.local is already used by mDNS/Zeroconf.
You mean mDNS/Zeroconf are using a tld that was already being used.