• jol@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    99% of people want computers to serve them, not to be fun. My SO couldn’t care less how much fun I have setting up home assistant. They just want to turn on the lights.

    • EvilCartyen@feddit.dk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 day ago

      Well, yes, most people want computers to be unnoticable and boring. I agree, we need more boring tech that just does a job and doesn’t bother us. That said, plenty of people find self-hosting to be fun - your SO and mine excepted, of course.

      • WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 day ago

        most people want computers to be unnoticable and boring. I agree, we need more boring tech

        professional UI designers don’t seem to agree. they always feel the urge to come up with the next worst design

        • aksdb@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 day ago

          For me it’s not even about better or worse, but about different. For them it’s a nice iteration after many years, but for be it is one of the dozens of apps I use irregularly that suddenly behaves and works different and forces me to relearn things I don’t have any gain from. Since each of the different apps get that treatment every once in a while, I end up having to adjust all the damn time for something else.

          I would really like we could go back to functional applications being sold as is without forced updates. I do not need constant changes all the time. WinAmp hasn’t changed in 20 years and still does exactly what it is supposed to. I could probably spin up an old MS Word 2000 and it would work just like it did 20 years ago.

          Many modern apps however change constantly. No wonder they all lean towards subscriptions if they “have to” work on it all the time. But I, as a user, don’t even want that. I want to buy the thing that does what it’s supposed to and then I want it to stay that way.

      • null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        My SO watches free tier youtube.

        Edit: please stop with the alternative youtube client suggestions. I’ve tried. She likes the YT app and the ads. This hill is not worth dying on.

            • A Wild Mimic appears!@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              6 hours ago

              I’ve set up my SO with adfree alternative clients for Youtube 3 times now, and she always defaults back to the adinfested youtube app - and she’s at least a competent user. i cannot wrap my head around it, but it’s her time and attention she’s wasting, not mine.

            • moomoomoo309@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              8 hours ago

              If they’re on android, try revanced. It’s a patched YouTube apk, so the interface is the same (unless you change stuff, like, for example, disabling shorts - but by default, it’s the same).