There is no link and you should list them anyways. As it stands, this is click bait without the click.

which it turned out belonged to James […] whose number appears on his company website.

When Smethurst challenged that, it admitted: “You’re right,” and said it may have been “mistakenly pulled from a database”.

but the overreach of taking an incorrect number from some database it has access to is particularly worrying.

I really love this new style of journalism where they bash the AI for hallucinating and making clear mistakes, to then take anything it says about itself at face value.

It’s a number on a public website. The guy googled it right after and found it. Its simply in the training data, there is nothing “terrifying” about this imo.

My own decisions have certainly not always been the right ones. A bit of insight, even from strangers, can sometimes help.