What do you mean by “won’t install”? If you install it with apt
from repo, apt
doesn’t check the distro codename, it just checks if the package dependencies are satisfied.
- 0 Posts
- 6 Comments
Well, first I need to note that
blkdiscard
is not more secure. But it is much more faster. It does not actually wipe flash memory, it just tells the controller to mark it as unused. So it will drop stored data at the moment it decides the best. Maybe immediately, maybe just before writing new data. But anyway it wont provide ability to read it. It would be still possible if you can get direct access to the flash memory bypassing the controller.Second, you forgot that SSDs are not HDDs and data are not stored exactly at offset you write them. The controller remaps memory blocks as needed. And it has more blocks than actually available to user. So when you use
dd
(orcp
, or any other program writing directly to block device) you only override blocks that are actually mapped, but some blocks can still keep old data. So usingdd
is also not secure in case someone can get direct access to the flash memory. But it takes much longer time and reduces the flash lifetime.Several people here mentioned a secure erase feature of SSDs. I didn’t know about it. It should be more secure than both methods if implemented correctly by the manufacturer (i. e. clears all memory cells immediately). In the worst case it could be the same as
blkdiscard
, I guess.
/dev/random
, seriously? This will take ages and have no advantages over/dev/zero
. Even when you really need to fill your drive with random data, use/dev/urandom
, there’s a chance that this will finish in couple days at least. And no, there’s no guarantee that it will wipe all blocks because there are reserved blocks that only device firmware can access and rotate. Some data on rotated blocks still can be accessible for forensic analysis if you care about this.
Just use
blkdiscard
.
I’m currently running mint cinnamon (how original, I know), and asking because i can’t seem to add mullvad-vpn stable repo.
What’s the problem? Mint is based on Ubuntu, use the corresponding Ubuntu repo (
noble
in case of Mint 22.1).
disclaimer
I’m a Debian user and not a Mullvad user. When installing software, I carefully read instructions and almost never follow them because in most cases I know how to deal with my distro better than developers.
There is a repo for noble, I’ve checked this before writing my answer. It is always possible to edit apt sources config manually and specify any repo you want regardless your distro codename. IDK what is Mint Store, isn’t it about flatpacks that TS doesn’t want to use?